• Pons_Aelius
    link
    fedilink
    101 year ago

    Nah. then they will charge the child (and try them as a adult…) for distributing child porn images.

    • DarkThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      I swear I’ve read a similar headline a while ago of some teen being charged for that, because they sent nude selfies of themselves.

      • Pons_Aelius
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        That is where I got the (fucked up) idea from.

        IIRC: In USA. Teen sent nude pic to his girlfriend, both 16. He was charged with distributing child porn and put on a sex offender register for life.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          USA is determined to out stupid every other country on earth isn’t it.

          • @cactusupyourbutt
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            a child bathing naked isnt neccessarily csam, really depends on the nature of the picture

            • DarkThoughts
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              Neither is a teen freely sending a nude selfie of themselves to their teen SO.
              Many family photo albums feature naked kids in various stupid situations that were just thought to be cute and funny at the time, which would nowadays melt peoples brains if they’d hear about it, and certainly would fall under the same laws that would punish the teen in the other example.

              • @cactusupyourbutt
                link
                English
                11 year ago

                the big difference here is that the child bathing doesnt have any sexual intent, while the teen selfie does

                • DarkThoughts
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  I can have some sexual intend on photos of naked children bathing too. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
                  That’s not really how those laws work though.