• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    First off this is not just the covid inquiry as a whole. This is Johnson, the main protagonist behind the Covid enquiry and the most damaging subject of that enquiry. The guy who was responsible for the decision making behind faults of the enquiry. He is also a buffoon who cannot hide from his mistakes. Wanting to keep him specifically out of the limelight is beneficial to the perception of how the Tories are ran.

    I see you do not mention the issues that Sunak is facing. Sunak is an impending change of government. The same government that imposed those events that led to that lady’s demise. You would think this is immensely more noteworthy than an individual’s plight.

    And yes there is coverage of the inquiry. That was part of the funding for the inquiry. It is meant to be public. But like all things political there is a bandwidth to what the public look at. That bandwidth is dictating by media coverage and how much is pushed front and centre. My point was that the BBC is sadly lacking in pushing events front and centre that are considered damaging to the Tory party. Even the title of the subject created by the OP is stating that this is OTT for the subject matter at hand.

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Yes - and Johnson’s testimony was front and centre on the news pages for the whole day yesterday. The lead story was Sunak’s Payments to Rwanda and the resignation of Cleverley.

      Sunak’s testimony is next week and will be covered and picked over in detail.

      There’s no conspiracy here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        No one said there is a conspiracy. The BBC has blatant bias issues. What do you think the Lineker was about and the subsequent resignation that followed it. Bloody hell even Emily Maitlis took the effort to diss the BBC when she left.