• bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      @yA3xAKQMbq

      @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @n2burns @InquisitiveApathy

      I have had cars that I drove twice the national average, and cars hardly driven at all. In all cases the fixed costs exceed the variable costs. I don’t know where the others are getting there data from, but it doesn’t match mine. Of course different driving habits, but per lifetime of the car (not km!) the fixed costs are more in my experience.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        The argument was not whether fixed cost exceed the variable cost or vice versa.

        The argument was that a lot of people severely underestimate the actual cost of any given trip because they only account for (a subset of) the variable costs (i.e. gas).

        And it’s true. Rarely anyone does full costing when it comes to cars because „the fixed cost are there no matter how much you drive“.

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          @yA3xAKQMbq

          @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @n2burns @InquisitiveApathy

          the argument in this thread has been about if fixed vs variable costs where more. I fully agree cars are expensive no matter how you do the math, and most people underestimate it (in part by only considering gas). However I stand by my claim that once you have the car you may as well use it as the additional variable costs from all optional trips is tiny (I’m assuming that you have the car for some purpose that cannot be done by something else - towing the proverbial boat for example).