Maybe you should re-read the conversation. Once again you are lost in the sauce.
The inference was that the two were similar. They are not. Not even close. If you had read either of the articles, you would have known that, but you so desperately want to be right on something, you just had to get in the middle.
Maybe you should re-read the conversation. Once again you are lost in the sauce.
The inference was that the two were similar. They are not. Not even close. If you had read either of the articles, you would have known that, but you so desperately want to be right on something, you just had to get in the middle.
What claim did Bandit make? What claim are you trying to hold them to?