• @madcaesar
    link
    English
    171 year ago

    Great, it’s still a stupid and insane law. Prohibit ALL public burnings of books? Ok I think it’s stupid, but whatever. But only protect those with religious significance? This is just an awful precedence.

    Religions don’t deserve respect, because they don’t respect others. Nevermind the fact that they are essentially fables and folklore told by adults.

    • @threeLetterMeyhem
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Prohibit ALL public burnings of books? Ok I think it’s stupid, but whatever.

      I’m OK with prohibited public burnings for the purpose of fire safety, I guess. Beyond that, I don’t think I’d want to limit free speech in this manner.

      • @madcaesar
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Exactly it’s dumb, but restricting it just to religious texts is even dumber.