threelonmusketeersM to [email protected]English • 1 year agoFalcon 9 Go Brrrsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down123file-text
arrow-up151arrow-down1imageFalcon 9 Go Brrrsh.itjust.worksthreelonmusketeersM to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square26fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-21 year agoI see 5 non-Starlink launches, only 1 of which is a Falcon Heavy. 7/1 Euclid (2160 kg) 7/29 Jupiter-3 (9200 kg) 8/3 Galaxy 37 (5063 kg) 8/26 Crew 7 (13000 kg) 9/2 SDA Tranche 0B (mass not listed) Via https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches So, that’s more like 9-10% of their Q3 total, and still more than CASC or Roscosmos.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoFantastic! Thanks for putting in the legwork with the correction.
I see 5 non-Starlink launches, only 1 of which is a Falcon Heavy.
7/1 Euclid (2160 kg)
7/29 Jupiter-3 (9200 kg)
8/3 Galaxy 37 (5063 kg)
8/26 Crew 7 (13000 kg)
9/2 SDA Tranche 0B (mass not listed)
Via https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches
So, that’s more like 9-10% of their Q3 total, and still more than CASC or Roscosmos.
Fantastic! Thanks for putting in the legwork with the correction.