The figures - gathered by a network of Afghan veterans - reveal the scale of what one former UK general calls a “betrayal” and a “disgrace”.

The soldiers fled to Pakistan, which now says it will expel Afghan refugees.

The UK says it has brought thousands of Afghans to safety.

Gen Sir Richard Barrons, who served the British Army in Afghanistan over 12 years, told BBC Newsnight that the failure of the UK to relocate these soldiers “is a disgrace, because it reflects that either we’re duplicitous as a nation or incompetent”.

“Neither are acceptable,” he said. “It is a betrayal, and the cost of that betrayal will be people who served with us will die or spend their lives in prison.”

  • @TheGrandNagus
    link
    71 year ago

    Right, so colonialism is when a country doesn’t give residency or citizenship to people that fought alongside British forces, officially or unofficially.

    You’re shoehorning a completely unrelated topic into this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        That’s a vassal state, not a colony. Under colonial rule, there is no ‘real’ government and there are strong economic ties between colonizer and colonized.

    • @MataVatnik
      link
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Did you read the comment you replied to? I literally said it wasn’t colonialism in that comment.

        • @MataVatnik
          link
          01 year ago

          My point is that it’s worse than colonialism. Bruh. Holy shit lol.

          • @TheGrandNagus
            link
            01 year ago

            Lmao

            Not giving foreign soldiers citizenship is worse than colonialism. Christ.

            Someone’s never read a history book.