“The rich gazed at their superyachts, and decided they were not enough. The new breed of megayachts, which are at least 70 metres (230ft) in length, may be the most expensive moveable assets ever created.”

“First and foremost, owning a megayacht is the most polluting activity a single person can possibly engage in. Abramovich’s yachts emit more than 22,000 tonnes of carbon every year, which is more than some small countries. Even flying long-haul every day of the year, or air-conditioning a sprawling palace, would not get close to those emissions levels.

The bulk of these emissions happen whether or not a yacht actually travels anywhere. Simply owning one – or indeed building one – is an act of enormous climate vandalism.”

  • @shalafi
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    No, everything does not count at this point. We are at war for the fate of our species, and I don’t think that’s overstating the point.

    People are emotional creatures, not logical. This is Sales 101. You sell emotions, not facts. That’s how you convince people, motivate people, bend them to your will. “Power to the Righteous People’s Cause!” is failed, Cold War, communist propaganda.

    Your post is emotional. Mine is, I feel, logical.

    For all the reasons I outlined above, banning super yachts is a waste of political capital, emotional capital if you will.

    We would be handing the billionaires a political win, a “meme” win, losing “hearts and minds”, for very little benefit. And they have an outsized voice, yes? And we intend to antagonize them in this fashion?

    If I’m buck naked and going up against the goddamned Batman, I’m shooting him in the face, not kicking his kneecap.