• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    I found a lot of the same. For me I resolved this by changing a few things.

    1. Abandon KDE plasma and Gnome.
    2. Avoid Snaps like the plague.

    Linux mint Cinnamon draws 5w on idle only laptop. Ubuntu stock draws 8w. Manjaro plasma uses around 7w.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Isn’t vanilla KDE Plasma faster and less resource-intensive than Cinnamon?

      The Mint devs present the XFCE option as a “more lightweight” alternative to the Cinnamon option, and Plasma has been more efficient than XFCE for over three years now.

      • @cholesterol
        link
        51 year ago

        Plasma has been more efficient than XFCE for over three years now.

        I don’t know which is technically snappier, but ram not being used does not equal snappier performance.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          I think power draw is a better measurement for efficiency.

          Making it more practical. Most people have more RAM than they need, but everyone is limited by battery capacity on laptops.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I suspect that packaging has a lot to do with it. I also value power draw as a better metric for determining efficiency compared to RAM usage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        I’m going to reply with an anecdotal no.

        On my hardware, cinnamon “feels” faster than plasma.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I cant abandon KDE because I like it way to much. I have a powerful computer and I feel like linux is to optimized. Sometimes I just want programs to use as much resources as they need to run perfectly.

      I think once I move over to wayland I will feel that snappiness.

    • @uis
      link
      11 year ago
      1. Play games with SDL_VIDEODRIVER=kmsdrm