• @angrystego
    link
    211 months ago

    Yeah, so by your definition this is definitely not mind reading. I wouldn’t expect it to be error-proof ever. Not even usual communication is. And this is just a beginning - their success rate seems to be 40 %.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      Honestly, I’m a good reader (regular old text reader, not mind), but I’m not perfect. Imo the line for this should be drawn at “accurate enough to be practically useful”