ZeroCool to [email protected]English • 7 months agoAn Iowa fight over a Satanic display reminds us: Republicans believe "free speech" is only for themwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1234arrow-down11 cross-posted to: [email protected]politics[email protected]
arrow-up1233arrow-down1external-linkAn Iowa fight over a Satanic display reminds us: Republicans believe "free speech" is only for themwww.salon.comZeroCool to [email protected]English • 7 months agomessage-square26fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]politics[email protected]
minus-squarelittleblue✨link1•7 months agoI’m not defending the fucknuts, etc., I’m pointing out that “demons” is outdated and childish. Might as well call them boogeymen, FFS.
minus-squarequeermunist she/herlinkfedilink-5•edit-27 months agolol and calling people “fucknuts” isn’t childish? Might as well call them doodie heads 🙄
minus-squarelittleblue✨link1•edit-27 months agoThere’s precedent for fricative-fueled illustrative expletives, friendo. Welcome to cultural morphology. Care to read a book?
minus-squarequeermunist she/herlinkfedilink-5•7 months agoThat shit is for middle schoolers and South Park characters. It’s not creative or cute. It’s cringe.
I’m not defending the fucknuts, etc., I’m pointing out that “demons” is outdated and childish. Might as well call them boogeymen, FFS.
lol and calling people “fucknuts” isn’t childish?
Might as well call them doodie heads 🙄
There’s precedent for fricative-fueled illustrative expletives, friendo. Welcome to cultural morphology. Care to read a book?
That shit is for middle schoolers and South Park characters. It’s not creative or cute. It’s cringe.