• @Jackthelad
      link
      English
      -1211 months ago

      What better way to show how all-in you are on the idea of the “open web” by… err… blocking another website from interacting with you. 🤷

      • murph
        link
        fedilink
        1311 months ago

        It’s not like it’s an unknown little upstart. Facebook/Meta have a track record of taking as much from users as possible, and selling it. Some hesitation in giving them more seems prudent.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        This is more a question of tolerance. We know Facebook is NOT tolerant of competitors, of the open web, of free software, etc. They cannot survive as a megacorp without a level of assurance and control that they can’t have if they’re “just another fediserver”. They WILL try to wrangle control. They WILL try to eat us all up. Why let the fox in the henhouse when you already know it’s a fox?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Unironically this; open web standards giving users freedom to decide who they interact with, as opposed to a closed service where the only choice is to like it or leave.

      • SharkAttak
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        One of the key features of the Fediverse is the ability to block those instances that are toxic or annoying, so…