This has been a hot topic for conservatives. I fully support Ukraine, but at some point, they have to say they can’t push Russia out. Ukraine does not have the manpower or firepower to dislodge Russia. They’ve tried and failed. Western support is starting to go down because they have not made progress.

I don’t know the solution, but right now, it’s just a war of attrition, and Ukraine loses in that scenario. I suspect this will be a big topic of discussion during the presidential debates.

  • Bleeping Lobster
    link
    2011 months ago

    They haven’t failed. They need advanced firepower and continued support. Putin from the start is relying on you lot sticking a spoke in the gears, and unsurprisingly conservatives are lining up to do his bidding.

    You have a golden opportunity to boost US businesses (most Ukraine aid never leaves the US); hammer a rival, hostile nation; and prevent further encroachment on your allies. Further, all this comes at zero cost of US lives.

    Or you could let Putin win.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -311 months ago

      Conservatives are sabotaging Ukraine’s efforts by not giving them every thing they need right now? That is a very entitled attitude.

      The question is how much does funding a proxy war against Russia help the US. For some the bemifits have outweighed the costs, for others it is a holy crusade and no cost is too great.

    • NeuromancerOPM
      link
      fedilink
      -1511 months ago

      The counter-offensive failed. They did not re-claim any real amount of territory. They need a lot of things but it isn’t our job to keep supplying them. We are putting our own country at risk by depleting our stockpiles.

      and who is you lot? I clearly stated I support Ukraine but there is a certain point you have to say if this continues, Ukraine is going to collapse. The US has publically stated they believe the losses are about 1:1. That means Ukraine is a lot worse off than Russia if this continues.

      At some point you have to say it’s not worth the money we are spending and exposing our sensitive technology to hostile nations.

      • Bleeping Lobster
        link
        711 months ago

        The US has publically stated they believe the losses are about 1:1

        Can I see your source for that?

        The counter-offensive failed. They did not re-claim any real amount of territory

        Categorically untrue. It’s certainly stalled, in large part because Russia was allowed the time to dig in deeply, as Ukraine was drip-fed the arms and ammo they desperately needed. You can’t use the fact that Ukraine has not been properly supplied as reasoning to stop supplying them completely.

        At some point you have to say it’s not worth the money we are spending and exposing our sensitive technology to hostile nations.

        Again, most of the ‘aid money’ stays in your country. The money you are ‘spending’ is enriching US businesses and creating jobs. Further, the ‘sensitive technology’ is almost exclusively stockpiled weaponry that, if unused, would need to be binned eventually.

        Leaving weapons gathering dust until they’re not usable in case someone discovers how they work is utter lunacy. They were made to be used, and even better, you don’t have to lift a finger as Ukrainian soldiers are the ones risking their lives.

        Putin will not stop at Ukraine. The global system of order is at stake. The US looks pretty weak right now, and it’s all thanks to conservatives (that’s who I mean by ‘you lot’, I presume you’re a conservative since you’re posting anti-Ukraine material to a conservative group).

        If you genuinely support Ukraine, then you’d support properly arming them so they can defend their country from a nation that’s hostile to both them AND you. Russia has ratfucked your election system, ratfucked your congress and senate, interfered with your democracy (such as it is), as well as mine and many other countries. You should be gunning to get at them, not bending over backwards to do their bidding. Which is what you’re doing by blocking funding for Ukraine.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -311 months ago

          Putin will not stop at Ukraine. The global system of order is at stake.

          In what fucking universe does Russia have that much military capabilities? They arguably only barely had it at the height of the ussr, let alone today

          • Bleeping Lobster
            link
            211 months ago

            Putin isn’t the only threat to global stability. I didn’t say ‘Russia will conquer the world’. Think.

            What message does it send to countries like China (vs Taiwan who are crucial for chip manufacturing) when the USA is too weak to counter Russia?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -411 months ago

              China would have to be insane to invade Taiwan, us involvement or not.

              when the USA is too weak to counter Russia?

              Lmao good to know you’re entirely divorced from reality

              • Bleeping Lobster
                link
                111 months ago

                Remind me again, which USA political party sent a bunch of their senators to Moscow on Independance Day? Was it the one you vote for?

                • NeuromancerOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -411 months ago

                  We don’t vote for parties. We vote for people. What senator from Oregon went to Moscow?

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -511 months ago

                Right now I can’t see China invading. They would destroy everything they want to keep. China could win the war, but that would be a pyrrhic victory.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  011 months ago

                  Exactly. China stands to gain basically nothing from an invasion. Taiwan has naturally defensible terrain, and the only thing they have of value is the semiconductor industry, which would be destroyed in the war. And both the optics and casualties would absolutely suck for China and ruin their reputation hard.

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -211 months ago

                    That and China have never shown great competence in using their military. I suspect they are a paper tiger.

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -611 months ago

              Don’t worry. We will get the Democrats out before they weaken us to much more. All the whining they did about defense spending has allowed Ukraine to hold Russia off for two years. Had the Republicans not spent the money, Ukraine would have fallen after a week.

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          -411 months ago

          Can I see your source for that? It is poor form to ask for common knowledge. I did a quick search and this one doesn’t show the one to one ratio. It does show Ukraine is losing a larger portion of its troops.

          https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-russia-death-toll-questions-bakhmut-counteroffensive-1800947

          Russia’s death toll has surpassed 200,000, Kyiv’s military said on Wednesday, but the updated figure also raises questions about the losses sustained by Ukraine as its forces prepare a counteroffensive. A leaked document from the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency which circulated online in April 2023 suggested that Ukraine had sustained between 124,000 and 131,000 total casualties.

          Categorically untrue. It’s certainly stalled, in large part because Russia was allowed the time to dig in deeply, as Ukraine was drip-fed the arms and ammo they desperately needed. You can’t use the fact that Ukraine has not been properly supplied as reasoning to stop supplying them completely.

          It is categorically true. The counter-offensive has failed. There is no way to spin it otherwise. They did not achieve their military objective before winter. That is a failure. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/11/us/politics/us-ukraine-war-strategy.html

          If you genuinely support Ukraine, then you’d support properly arming them so they can defend their country from a nation that’s hostile to both them AND you. Ukraine is not defending America. Russia won’t attack America. The last time they did, Trump killed hundreds of Wagner soldiers.

          • Bleeping Lobster
            link
            3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Russia attacks your country in many ways, not just with troops. Do you know what asymmetric warfare means?

            Your ‘source’ for 1:1 figure is a leaked, unverified document?

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -511 months ago

              The one to one was a comment from general Milley.

              And we do the same to Russia.

      • @roofuskit
        link
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It is blatantly obvious that you have no idea what you’re talking about.

        Gotta toe the party line though right? Gotta support dear leader and repeat whatever they feed you.

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          -411 months ago

          Sure, show me where I am wrong.

          And don’t make personal attacks. Stick to the topic.

          • @roofuskit
            link
            211 months ago

            People already have rebutted, you’re just going to argue with the bullshit you got from GOP/Russian propogandists.

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -511 months ago

              Nobody has rebutted. They’ve whined. I’ve cited my claims.

              So what do you think I’m inaccurate about old sport since unliked you. I’ve cited my claims

              • @roofuskit
                link
                311 months ago

                You have not cited sources for all your claims. And Newsweek is not a reliable source for military analysis. So do yourself a favor and don’t try to use them for your other claims.

                • NeuromancerOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -611 months ago

                  Which claim do you think is not supported? Newsweek is more reliable than you. So cite away. All you have done so far is babble, try to be partisan, and try to insult. Be better. Use your words.

                  • @roofuskit
                    link
                    411 months ago

                    You have only posted two links for a single claim. No others. You’re the one claiming to have cited your sources. So cite them. I really am not interested in trying to reason someone out of a position they did not reason themselves into. Your stance is clearly a partisan one. You’re spewing the same BS as the mouthpieces and leadership of your party is telling you. You don’t understand where the money for the military aid goes, you don’t understand what we are getting for it, you don’t understand the stakes of appeasement, etc…

        • ThrowawayM
          link
          fedilink
          -711 months ago

          Fair warning, do not make personal attacks. Make an argument, keep it civil, all that good stuff.