• @Lauchs
    link
    -131 year ago

    I dunno, read again?

    I explained things pretty well in my original post. If you have questions or trouble understanding, I’d be happy to explain.

    • @the_q
      link
      12
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @Lauchs
        link
        -141 year ago

        I listened to her music voluntarily for the first time earlier this year, not my style.

        That being said, paying into a carbon offset is the best way to advance a regime that actually transitions us to a green economy.

        Are you a vegan who doesn’t have a car and won’t have children? That’s the best way to reduce your emissions. If not, are you as similarly unethical? And if it’s a scale issue, given the fact she makes so many people happy as evidenced by their willingness to pay seemingly infinite dollars to see her, well, I’m curious as to whether you feel you think you make a fraction of as many people happy?

        It’s easy to pile upon the rich but compared to most of the world, you are the Taylor Swift of the world. So these “no no, she costs a thousand times more!” Arguments don’t really hold, medium income westerner is responsible for a boatload more emissions than a poor third worlder, so why shouldn’t you be held to a similar nonsensical standard? At least Swift is contributing to the things that help us, what similar contributions have you made?

        • @mriormro
          link
          51 year ago

          At least Swift is contributing to the things that help us

          holy shit

          • @Lauchs
            link
            -81 year ago

            Am I better than Taylor Swift?

            According to the folks above, that depends on how much you fly?

        • @the_q
          link
          3
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          deleted by creator