Exactly why the aid should be tied to Ukraine. We have an obligation to defend our country first. Why are the Democrats so reluctant to defend our own border?

  • @JBar2
    link
    51 year ago

    That’s fine, we should also tie border security funding to domestic gun control legislation

          • PizzaMan
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Somebody failed to read the article. It was SCOTUS themselves who said it was legal.

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -41 year ago

              How queer. It shows as a hyperlink when you said, Remember the convoy.

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -41 year ago

              No, that isn’t what the court said. I would love to see you cite where the court said the ban was legal as they did not say it was legal or illegal.

              What the court ruled is they would not allow an emergency injunction. They did not rule on taking or denying the case. What the court did say is they will let the appellate court finish before they review the case.

              Once the appellate court is done then it can be sent to SCOTUS.

      • @misophist
        link
        21 year ago

        What? Nobody is talking about our well-regulated military’s right to use guns. Gun control is about limiting access to guns for non-military folks. Nothing in the constitution about that.

        • NeuromancerOPM
          link
          fedilink
          -21 year ago

          What? Nobody is talking about our well-regulated military’s right to use guns. Gun control is about limiting access to guns for non-military folks. Nothing in the constitution about that.

          Heller has stated it’s an individual right outside of military service. Right or wrong, that is the ruling from the court.

          That is why the Illinois ban will get struck down. An AR-15 can server a military purpose which historically was the requirement for protection under the law.

          • @misophist
            link
            21 year ago

            Who gives a shit about rulings from the court? They overturn their shit all the time. See Roe v. Wade. Law matters and this is it, broseiden.

            • NeuromancerOPM
              link
              fedilink
              -21 year ago

              Umm. The people of America.

              This court is more pro 2nd amendment than the last. So I don’t see it being stayed especially using your logic.

              • @misophist
                link
                21 year ago

                You like that politically charged language, don’t you? This court is certainly anti-American, anti-women, and anti-children, so I concur, they would do anything they can that fosters an environment where more women, children, and Americans in general will die.

                • NeuromancerOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  I disagree. I fell this is the best court we’ve had in my lifetime.