• rivermonster
    link
    English
    -191 year ago

    Your apology for terrorists and war crimes of the elected government of Gaza says everything.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      Yeah, I’m not going to disagree with the condemnation of the terrorist attack. That said, Israel has been, objectively, committing war crimes for decades now unpunished.

      Two wrongs don’t make a right, not justifying just explaining, and all that.

      • rivermonster
        link
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Before Oct. all the apartheid collective punishment was absolutely war crimes, and I’d love to see Bibi and many Likud members at the ICC for their crimes. They can still argue that Gaza was an operational location for Hamas, but I think and hope they’d lose that argument.

        But after October… Hamas officially made Gaza a theater of war and any target they co-locate in loses legal protections. And when I see 57% resident support for Hamas there (their elected governement), I steuggle and mostly feel awful for the 43% who don’t support them.

        I am with you that two wrongs don’t make a right. Or in this region’s case, an endless cycle of thousands of years of violence don’t make a right.

        But I also believe strongly that Israel has a right to defend itself. The current mess is Hamas’s design. I don’t know what people want Israel to do, take the terrorist attack that killed 1200+… just take it on the chin and go “oh well”? When any honest person knows no nation on earth would do that.

        Take my upvote, a rare one on the worldnews group.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Fully agree Israel has a right to defend itself but what it seems to be doing now is more akin to invasive eradication than defense. They are on the offensive. Why does 1.2K dead in Israel justify 18K dead, hospitals targeted and destroyed, and a forced emigration of citizens in Gaza?

          If a terrorist organization ruled the US I’m sure more than half the country would vote in support either out of blind nationalism or fear. Putin’s got >90% support, eh? I don’t think it’s fair to say any recent election in Gaza is unbiased. It would also seem not so unreasonable that to the people of Gaza, Hamas looks more friendly than Israel recently.

          • rivermonster
            link
            English
            -81 year ago

            Because when Hamas co-locates out of them they lose protected status.

            If Hamas looks friendly to you, I desperately urge you to research some history outside of your bubble. I’m floored.

        • @SkippingRelax
          link
          English
          81 year ago

          If you replace every occurrence of hamas with nethanyahu your comments makes half sense

          • rivermonster
            link
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t see a difference between Bibi and his partner Hamas. Never have. And I hate Likud.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              The main difference is the power dynamic. One of those groups has all of the power, including the backing of the US military, while the other is a reaction to oppression.

              Only one of those two parties has the power to end all of this right now.

        • @rumbletom
          link
          English
          61 year ago

          Pompous know it nothing

          • rivermonster
            link
            English
            -41 year ago

            Thanks for your personal attack! Have a great day.

        • prole
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Take my upvote, a rare one on the worldnews group.

          After reading past your first paragraph, I’m not sure I want it from you.

          Hamas is a reaction to the mess, not its “designer.”

          • rivermonster
            link
            English
            -31 year ago

            Said every apologist for terroism and terrorists.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Yes, terrorism is one potential reaction/outcome of brutal occupation and oppression. There is a difference between explaining something and condoning it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      your apology for terrorists and war crimes and settler colonialism and genocide by the elected government of Israel says everything

      • rivermonster
        link
        English
        -101 year ago

        I don’t. I call for the prosecution of Bibi and many Likud members for their war crimes before October.

        Would love to see them in the ICC.

        You must have confused me with the Hamas fans and apologists in here who support terrorism and war crimes and justify and apologize for it endlessly.