• @coldv
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      While it’s obvious that it failed because they ignored safety regulations and certifications that are in place for a reason, it is still important to prove with physical evidence so they know 100% without a doubt. This would officially serve as a warning to other egotistic innovator wannabes who want to cut corners.

    • @QHC
      link
      English
      101 year ago

      To try and prevent something similar in the future.

    • @kaotic
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      I think some of it is to fully understand the failure mechanism.

    • @lemmein
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Morbid curiosity

    • credit crazy
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      While it’s pretty painfully obvious lesson being make your sub have standard safety equipment and don’t use proven terrible ideas when making well tbh anything it’s while a formality to investigate the wreck of the possible crime it’s a formality needed to see who is at fault like yea it’s likely that this sub imploded due to it’s many flaws there is the off chance that maybe it imploded because of something that any sub would struggle with it’s best for society to have a unbiased view that doesn’t jump to conclusions when judging even the dumbest of morons like Stockton rush

    • @TONKAHANAH
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      yeah, does seem a bit excessive. unless the goal was to retrieve like a black box for info, there is an entire ship down there, hardly seems like leaving one small tube makes a difference

      • @demonsword
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I wonder if there is a black box to be found, after all the sub was build cutting as many corners as they could get away with