• ShadowRam
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    I hate this stupid word ‘drone’

    Cruise missiles have all the same navigation and course correction tech in it.

    These are the same thing with a propeller instead of a rocket and less payload.

    • @CompostMaterial
      link
      English
      201 year ago

      I mean, there is a difference. You even pointed it out. With a rocket you go point A to point B. That is it. With a prop, you can fly around for as long as your fuel supply lasts. Which is what makes it a drone.

      • ShadowRam
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        These only go from point A to to point B.

        rockets can fly around for as long as their fuel supply lasts.

        • @Pipoca
          link
          English
          101 year ago

          These seem like they can circle for rather longer than a rocket could.

          There’s a bit of a difference, tactically, between a rocket with 2 min of fuel vs a prop plane with 5 hours of fuel.

      • @mercano
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        A Tomahawk cruise missile only uses a rocket motor to take off from a ship or submarine. After launch, it unfolds its wings and uses a jet engine to fly to its target.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “Added unfolding wings for effect of cool.”

          Seriously though, Rocket and jet engine is heavy. I know that from KSP.

    • sylver_dragon
      link
      English
      111 year ago

      Cruise missiles are usually self-guided. Drones are often remotely piloted with some autonomous functions (loitering, station keeping, return to base). No idea what the case is for these new AQ400 units. Given the usage of the term “drone”, my guess is that these will be remotely piloted.