• @SkippingRelax
    link
    English
    71 year ago

    So just to be clear what old mate you are responding to here is trying to say is that until a few months ago, and for over a decade, me and him could click on a tweet and see what it was about, i used to do this all the time on the Guardian and I haven’t had a twitter account in a very long time.

    Doesn’t matter what you think, what mastodon does and what you do with alpine wildlife. The fact that companies and outlets like the guardian still do this to this day, that they still post shit on twitter than most of us can’t (or don’t want, or both) access is weird they should reconsider their communication choices and move on.

    As they say in Italy che cos’hanno al posto del cervello?

    • @Zahille7
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I mean we can all still look at (most) reddit posts if we don’t have an account currently.

      This whole “forcing us to have an account just to look at one post” is so blatantly and obviously a ploy to get your data. It’s kinda disgusting. I would have a tiny bit more respect for Twitter if they just said outright “hey, you need to login to see any of this content so we can get your data. Thanks and fuck you.”

      • @SkippingRelax
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        The funny part is that I can live without shitter no problem. I wish major organisations would stop using it but if I cannot open a like I’m just meh. They lost the little traffic I was giving them.

        While I stopped browsing reddit since moving to lemmy, I do still access old posts and that’ssomething I cannot replace that easily. Later today I’ll do some research on some niche topics that I am sure will lead me to old reddit posts. Nice to be able to do it without an account (for now). And when they force me, I’ll just open a new one for lunch lurking, not using my old one(s) anymore