• R0cket_M00se
    link
    English
    01 year ago

    Unless you use a browser that uses its own ad and tracker blocking. I get fewer ads on Vivaldi without adblocking then I get on Firefox with ublock origin.

    Runs about half the resources that Firefox takes up too.

    Ad block on chromium was supposed to break in January when manifest v3 came around and it doesn’t seem like much has changed on browsers that were prepared for it like Brave and V.

    Edge and Chrome are fucked, but who cares about them anyways.

    • @Bazoogle
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      I used vivaldi for a period, but it’s still Chromium. I’m trying to support the only non-chromium option out there. The more users Firefox has, the better. Chrome and Chromium are so dominant, it’s seriously problematic.

    • @cowmouse
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      Unless you were running Firefx with outdated uBO filters, I doubt that. Vivaldi is a memory hog for me.

      • R0cket_M00se
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        Strange, it’s literally half of Firefox with equivalent tabs.

        • @cowmouse
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          What platform? Extensions? Any about:config changes?

          • R0cket_M00se
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Windows 10, 3200MHz CL16 32GB, Ryzen 5 3600XT.

            Extensions on Vivaldi are Bandcamp volume control, Bing unchained, and tubebuddy.

            Extensions on Fox: Firefox color, DDG privacy essentials, Ublock Origin.

            Same tabs open on each browser.

            YouTube, Spotify, Lemmy.world, and FB messenger.

            Methodology: played YouTube videos in each with all other tabs idle to ensure they were actively using system resources.

            FF: 1361MB (active) V: 764MB (active)

            That’s literally half. Also Firefox never seems to want to give back RAM, whereas Vivaldi drops back down by a factor of 1/7 when the video is paused. Fox only managed to give up a measly 60ish MB of it’s 1361.

            FF: 1306MB (idle) V: 628MB (Idle)

            Edit: I believe ublock being installed on FF is justified since I find the native ad blocking of Vivaldi to be just as good, namely in YouTube which is my primary concern. If you want an AdBlock free test that only wins points in Vivaldi’s favor for packaging it into the browser.

            • @cowmouse
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I just tried it and Firefox ESR uses ~800MB with a bing tab, a youtube tab focused and playing a video, a lemmy tab and a github tab. I’m running it on GNU/Linux, and I toggled dom.suspend_inactive.enabled in about:config. Edit: it also doesn’t really matter how much RAM it uses, it’ll unload tabs if the system is low on memory. Firefox is also faster for me.