• FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    01 year ago

    I said many of us. I know there were people here already when Reddit had its meltdown.

    I have no problem with individual instances federating or defederating with whomever they want. The problem is that there’s a movement afoot to try to get everyone to defederate with Meta. That’s what the “FediPact” is about, and this thread is about the FediPact. So I argue against that. If everyone defederates then there goes that choice you’re fond of.

    • aroom
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      where did you see that the fedipact main purpose was to impose defederation? that would be rich.

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        https://fedipact.online/ reads:

        “i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity”

        What goal do you think a pact like that has? Do you not think they want everyone else on board? Don’t waffle with some “will no one rid me of this troublesome priest” sophistry. They want Meta locked out.

        • aroom
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yes and that’s their right.

          But thankfully they don’t impose anything to anyone. You had me worried for a minute.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Indeed, one of the great benefits of an open protocol like ActivityPub is that it’s impossible to force stuff like this. So ironically, they’re going to fail to impose their desired outcome for the same reason that they don’t need to impose their desired outcome.