@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 11 months agoThe Kirin 9000s loses to its nearly 3-year older predecessor in benchmarksm.gsmarena.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up142arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up142arrow-down1external-linkThe Kirin 9000s loses to its nearly 3-year older predecessor in benchmarksm.gsmarena.com@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square3fedilinkfile-text
Nanoreview comparison: https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/hisilicon-kirin-9000s-vs-hisilicon-kirin-9000
minus-squarepgetsoslinkfedilink14•11 months agoExpected, since Hisislicon doesn’t have access to advanced process nodes, like 5nm equivalent and 3nm equivalent. They are stuck at 7nm equivalent. For me, it is impressive they are only 2-3 years behind at this moment.
minus-square@[email protected]OPMlinkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoTrue. Being able to match snapdragon 870 is no small feat. With time they should be able to surpass current gen snapdragon.
Expected, since Hisislicon doesn’t have access to advanced process nodes, like 5nm equivalent and 3nm equivalent. They are stuck at 7nm equivalent.
For me, it is impressive they are only 2-3 years behind at this moment.
True. Being able to match snapdragon 870 is no small feat. With time they should be able to surpass current gen snapdragon.