• roguetrick
    link
    fedilink
    25
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Fucking nuts. There was NEVER a reasonable reason to detain him. Crashing into someone’s house does not give you reasonable suspicion for an investigation. That’s not how it fucking works. I don’t understand why the prosecutor would even want to touch these bullshit charges.

    • Transporter Room 3
      link
      fedilink
      English
      229 months ago

      Seems like if the owners are guilty of anything worthy of arrest, the pigs are guilty of property damage, assault and battery, attempted murder (all these add “with a deadly weapon” for the fact that they’re armed and a 2000lb metal box is certainly deadly) , reckless driving, and a litany of other crimes that should land them in prison with life-crippling fines.

      • @LufyCZ
        link
        English
        -289 months ago

        Attempted murder is an insane stretch and it devalues your whole comment.

        • @MotoAsh
          link
          English
          179 months ago

          He intended to crash a vehicle. Vehicles are commonly viewed as deadly weapons when used as one. It is not a stretch what so ever.

          • @shalafi
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            Did I miss the part where it was intentional?

            • @MotoAsh
              link
              English
              19 months ago

              No, I just do not believe cops what so ever. At least the angry pigs that love throwing their undeserved power around.

              • @shalafi
                link
                English
                29 months ago

                I don’t trust them either, and I have plenty of personal experience to back that. Experience going back decades, when they were far worse.

                Back to attempted murder, that’s ludicrous. Cop fucked up and crashed, for whatever reason. They try to get away from responsibility by raising a fuss. Been there, done that. I can tell stories all night.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            09 months ago

            He intended to crash a vehicle.

            That’s not the same as intent to kill someone. Murder requires intent, without that it becomes manslaughter

            • @MotoAsh
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I think it’d depend. There are degrees of murder. You can ABSOLUTELY get charged with murder if someone dies due to extreme reckless neglegence in some jurisdictions.

              It’s kinda’ exactly why Derek Chauvin is in jail. He never intended to kill anyone, but he was so insanely reckless and careless. He was found guilty of BOTH lesser degrees of murder and manslaughter.

              For a more direct example, just look up all the street racers that get charged with murder.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Unintentional second degree murder is Minnesota’s version of felony murder. Felony murder does not require intent.

                Third degree murder in Minnesota requires a “depraved mind” which the example from this story wouldn’t meet.

                Edit: As a resident of Minnesota who studied the laws in both my Criminal Code and Criminal Law and Procedure classes, the incident from this article would not meet requirements for murder charges.

          • @LufyCZ
            link
            English
            -59 months ago

            So if I decide to crash into a tree, do I get charged with attempted murder?

            Even in cases of reckless driving, the charge is manslaughter, proving murder is gonna be hard unless there’s evidence of premeditation

            • Neato
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              Deciding to crash into a person is attempted murder. People live in houses.

              • @LufyCZ
                link
                English
                09 months ago

                They crashed into a place of business (as said in the article) at 1230am. No people are around shops at that time.

                Your argument would never stand in court.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  It was a bar so it’s very likely there were people around but it would still be hard to prove intent to kill.

                • @MotoAsh
                  link
                  English
                  09 months ago

                  Is that why the owner and others were still in the building? You’re literally making shit up that doesn’t even apply here.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          39 months ago

          Cops shoot people driving cars and claim it was for officer safety because the person could have run them over all the time.

          • @LufyCZ
            link
            English
            -29 months ago

            How is that in any way relevant?

            The officers crashed into a building, nobody started shooting ever in this case.

            • @voracitude
              link
              English
              39 months ago

              Cops lie on official paperwork all the time. “Turnabout is fair play”. It’s not been a long thread, but if you’re having that much trouble keeping track of the conversation, you can read the thread history before responding to remember what we’re talking about currently.

            • snooggums
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              If person driving = using a deadly weapon to justify shooting at the driver then cop driving = using a deadly weapon.