• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 months ago

    Competition doesn’t lead to innovation in improving people’s lives, but company profits. See: enshittification.

    • @assassin_aragorn
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      I see that as a consequence of the absurd monopolies we have. The best product should be what’s the most popular, and enshittification is counter to that. It tanks the product quality, and in a market with lots of competitors, it would be punished.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        It is one of the consequences of monopolies, but monopolies are a consequence of economic competition.

        The “winner” gets the losers stuff and customers (mergers for example), making the winner bigger and more able to manipulate the market to their benefit.

        When there are few enough companies profits can be chased without consideration for anything else (planned obsolescence, shipping jobs outside the country, lay-offs, etc.)

        So, like you said except in a for profit market, monopolies are inevitable.

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          English
          39 months ago

          In the absence of regulation, absolutely. If we had more stringent anti trust legislation though it might be possible to avoid.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        The best product should not be what’s most popular in Capitalism, what’s profitable to produce is what’s most profitable. With tons of competition, you just have competing levels of automation, corner cutting, and exploitation.

        Competition and markets in general are the cause of enshittification.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            Yep, Marx predicted this actually. A huge portion of Marx’s literature is even more relevant today than ever before.