• @derf82
    link
    English
    01 year ago

    That’s fine. I just would not have spent political capital on Griner, either.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      At least that has some return on investment, that’s if you’re looking at it from the perspective of a politician.

      Though I do find it pretty hypocritical that he spent that capital freeing someone from a crime that he himself is perfectly fine sending people to jail for in America.

      • @derf82
        link
        English
        -101 year ago

        What return? WNBA fans are not exactly a huge group.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          61 year ago

          But you know who she is… I’d say it’s pretty self evident that it was fairly effective PR.

          Reality doesn’t matter, politics revolves around perception and fabricating the PR story you want.

          “President saves famous female athlete from tyrant” is always going to be a net plus. The people who don’t agree or perceive it in a different fashion are either votes you wouldn’t win anyways, or people who don’t care about it enough to vote for someone else because of it.

          • @derf82
            link
            English
            -51 year ago

            Eh, I really don’t think many people are saying “I wasn’t going to vote for Biden, but he freed Brittney Griner.” And there are surely others who think Biden was wrong for trading an arms dealer for a WNBA “star.”

            • @Fades
              link
              English
              01 year ago

              Removed by mod

              • @derf82
                link
                English
                01 year ago

                The moronic move was trading the Merchant of Death for a WNBA player.

                Tell me, what was gained by the trade? How exactly was it worth the political capital? How is Griner worth it but Whaelen is not?