• @ImTryingLemmy
    link
    English
    601 year ago

    He’s not even thinking this through to a logical end. If this is legal (and I really doubt it is) wouldn’t that mean that Texans can be sued by anyone in a state with more restrictive gun laws if a gun sold in Texas ended up being used in a crime elsewhere? What about training? Ammunition?

    What a buffoon.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      391 year ago

      Hell, in some states you could make the argument that denying gender affirming care is denying medically necessary treatment.

      State of Washington should counter sue Texas hospitals for their failure to provide adequate and fair treatment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        you could make the argument that denying gender affirming care is denying medically necessary treatment.

        Because it is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          That’s what makes it so easy to argue. :)

          It definitely is ethically, but I don’t know that every state has legal provisions that would protect it in the same way that something like a heart procedure would be.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Yeah, that’s pretty emblematic of how seriously most of the country’s politicians take mental health 😮‍💨

            To the GOP ones like Paxton, it’s good for deflecting from the need for common sense gun control and for distortions to claim that everyone not exactly like them are unhinged, but when it comes to actually HELPING PEOPLE and by extension all of society (including their precious economy that overwhelmingly favor the rich and powerful such as themselves), they want nothing to do with it 🤬

        • wuphysics87
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Or they would be doing exactly what they are doing. They are morally bankrupt not stupid.