PugJesus to STOP DOING [email protected] • 1 year agoThis but maybe unironicallymedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up1149arrow-down116
arrow-up1133arrow-down1imageThis but maybe unironicallymedia.kbin.socialPugJesus to STOP DOING [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareGlitchingtonlinkEnglish5•1 year agoForza Horizon 5’s rally dlc had the worst lighting for first-person driving until I turned on low ray tracing. My lights went from obstructive yellow pixels to actual lighting from the headlights. There is value to the tech in certain uses.
minus-square@Poppa_MolinkEnglish18•1 year agoForced generic value. Don’t make a statement like that as if we weren’t able to emulate lights in video games effectively until Ray Tracing popped up. This is just forced implementation of a shit feature.
minus-squareGlitchingtonlinkEnglish4•edit-21 year agoI’m sharing my experience. Went from “Can’t see shit.” to “Wow, I can drive at night.” I’m not justifying the cards for the feature, simply pointing out a use-case for the feature. Edit: the value I referred to earlier, is not intended as the cost of an RTX card, rather that the tech has value.
Forza Horizon 5’s rally dlc had the worst lighting for first-person driving until I turned on low ray tracing. My lights went from obstructive yellow pixels to actual lighting from the headlights. There is value to the tech in certain uses.
Forced generic value.
Don’t make a statement like that as if we weren’t able to emulate lights in video games effectively until Ray Tracing popped up.
This is just forced implementation of a shit feature.
I’m sharing my experience. Went from “Can’t see shit.” to “Wow, I can drive at night.”
I’m not justifying the cards for the feature, simply pointing out a use-case for the feature.
Edit: the value I referred to earlier, is not intended as the cost of an RTX card, rather that the tech has value.