A loophole in FDA processes means older drugs like the ones in oral decongestants weren’t properly tested. Here’s how we learned the most popular one doesn’t work

In 2005, federal law compelled retailers nationwide to move pseudoephedrine, sold as Sudafed, from over-the-counter (OTC) to behind it, so as to combat its use in making illicit methamphetamine. This move changed the formulas of cough and cold medicines in the U.S… It also led me and my colleague Leslie Hendeles to prove that pseudoephedrine’s replacement, oral phenylephrine, was ineffective as a decongestant.

We petitioned the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) twice, yet it took the agency more than a decade and a half to act on our findings.

In September, an agency advisory panel finally agreed with our conclusion that this compound did little to quell congestion and recommended that products containing it be pulled from shelves. If FDA acts on this recommendation, oral phenylephrine could be the first OTC drug approved under the agency’s “monograph” process to be discontinued. But in the meantime, millions of people have been trusting the FDA’s OTC regulatory process to ensure that medications work, but instead have been wasting money for nearly two decades on ones that don’t.

  • @CrayonRosary
    link
    English
    711 months ago

    You could start by reading the body of the post and see what drug is mentioned. Then compare that to your bottle of Claritin.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        311 months ago

        CrayonRosary provided instructions for how to tell. If this change was relevant. And they were respectful about it.

      • @CrayonRosary
        link
        English
        -411 months ago

        A simple question which revealed you were too lazy to read the article before asking questions. You’re the worst kind of Lemmy user. Why should other people do the work for you just because you’re too lazy to do anything other than read the headline?

        You deserved a little bit of snark. Take your licks and go read the article now.

          • @CrayonRosary
            link
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Claritin-D has pseudoephedrine

            You clearly didn’t read the article which says nothing about pseudoephedrine not working. If you had, you wouldn’t have had to ask. Can you not tell the difference between the words pseudoephedrine and phenylephrine?

            Even if we give you the benefit of the doubt, and you were asking a sincere question after having read the article, it was a really poor one. You could have mentioned what your confusion was, but you were to lazy to do even that.

            what you didn’t understand.

            Funny.

            Take your likes

            Take my what now?

              • @CrayonRosary
                link
                English
                2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Did you still not read the article? Pseudoephedrine WORKS! Oral Phenylephrine DOES NOT! Claritin does NOT contain Phenylephrine. The article says nothing about pseudoephedrine not working, and yet you still don’t get it!

                No one ever said anywhere that Claritin-D doesn’t contain pseudoephedrine. No one! No one ever said pseudoephedrine doesn’t work. Who are you arguing against? Why are you so dense?

                Article:

                Phenylephrine doesn’t work.

                You:

                I swear Claritin works! I’m so confused!

                Me:

                Claritin isn’t phenylephrine, read the label.

                You:

                Nuh uh! Google says it contains pseudoephedrine!!

                Me: 🤦‍♂️