I like to omit the source sometimes just to draw out lazy comments like yours. It really shows that you’re not that interested but just want to argue. It’s the title of an article from one of the most prominent newspapers out there, it’d be the first result if you simply pasted it in Google, but rather than save yourself the embarrassment, you chose this route.
Swing and a miss.
The article is even better than the title.
Among the Native Americans reached over a five-month period ending in April, more than 7 in 10 said they did not feel the word “Redskin” was disrespectful to Indians. An even higher number — 8 in 10 — said they would not be offended if a non-native called them that name.
This is not about whether I’m lying or not, it’s about you preferring to stay ignorant, which proves the point that you don’t really care about the subject. If you want to close your eyes and pretend it’s nighttime, then it’s not my job to convince you otherwise.
I don’t know what illusion you are talking about. I know about a delusion. Specifically the delusion that you have where you expect everyone to just believe anything you declare.
I don’t expect people to believe anything I say, I do expect the average adult to not act like a man-baby in a normal conversation. I admit that sometimes bites me in the ass, but I prefer that over willful ignorance.
The article is still there by the way, I bet you’ve already figured that out but aren’t big enough to admit.
One way in which one would attempt to shift the burden of proof is by committing a logical fallacy known as the argument from ignorance. It occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proven false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proven true.
On top of that, what you’re arguing doesn’t even meet the criteria for burden of proof, as I’ve already posted not only the title but also a quote from the article. I’ve provided proof. YOU made an unfounded claim that it was false. YOU lack the proof that what I’ve said is a lie when the evidence for what I’ve said is right there for you and everyone else to see. I’m not obliged to do your leg work because you choose not to accept it. You’re just displaying the lazy man’s version of moving the goalposts with some arm chair infantile argument. There’s toddlers with more well founded tantrums than what you are attempting here.
So you spent a whole lot of time insulting me because you claimed you posted a link to an article and, rather than just show me the link even though I’ve asked you to multiple times, you’ve resorted to this. I’ll just flag you for trolling.
You know what I think? That you realize how much of a fool you’ve made out of yourself so the only way out is for you to keep digging. I bet you’ve already seen the article by now and this is just your way of weaseling out of admitting you were wrong.
Flag all you want, deluding yourself about things seems to be your favorite MO!
No, it’s how educating yourself despite the other person works. I was right, you expect to be spoon fed knowledge like a school age child. You know they teach you how to research in grade school and it doesn’t involve begging for sources.
No, it’s how educating yourself despite the other person works. I was right, you expect to be spoon fed knowledge like a school age child. You know they teach you how to research in grade school and it doesn’t involve begging for sources.
I like to omit the source sometimes just to draw out lazy comments like yours. It really shows that you’re not that interested but just want to argue. It’s the title of an article from one of the most prominent newspapers out there, it’d be the first result if you simply pasted it in Google, but rather than save yourself the embarrassment, you chose this route.
Swing and a miss.
The article is even better than the title.
Sorry, it’s not my job to find out whether or not you’re lying.
This is not about whether I’m lying or not, it’s about you preferring to stay ignorant, which proves the point that you don’t really care about the subject. If you want to close your eyes and pretend it’s nighttime, then it’s not my job to convince you otherwise.
Got it. You were lying.
Whatever you need to tell yourself to keep the illusion going. 🤡
I don’t know what illusion you are talking about. I know about a delusion. Specifically the delusion that you have where you expect everyone to just believe anything you declare.
I don’t expect people to believe anything I say, I do expect the average adult to not act like a man-baby in a normal conversation. I admit that sometimes bites me in the ass, but I prefer that over willful ignorance.
The article is still there by the way, I bet you’ve already figured that out but aren’t big enough to admit.
I went all the way back to the beginning of this conversation and I did not see any link to an article. Feel free to show me where it is.
You know Google exists right? Or do you only ever expect to be spoon fed knowledge like a child?
Insulting me won’t make your lies true. Sorry. And I’m not going to talk to you in two separate threads, so pick one.
Being wilfully ignorant won’t make you any more intelligent.
If you don’t want to argue in two threads don’t be stupid in so many places.
When you’re trying to educate yourself that’s exactly your job.
Nope. That’s not how the burden of proof works.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
From your link:
On top of that, what you’re arguing doesn’t even meet the criteria for burden of proof, as I’ve already posted not only the title but also a quote from the article. I’ve provided proof. YOU made an unfounded claim that it was false. YOU lack the proof that what I’ve said is a lie when the evidence for what I’ve said is right there for you and everyone else to see. I’m not obliged to do your leg work because you choose not to accept it. You’re just displaying the lazy man’s version of moving the goalposts with some arm chair infantile argument. There’s toddlers with more well founded tantrums than what you are attempting here.
I still am not seeing a link to an article.
So you spent a whole lot of time insulting me because you claimed you posted a link to an article and, rather than just show me the link even though I’ve asked you to multiple times, you’ve resorted to this. I’ll just flag you for trolling.
I’ve never made that claim.
You know what I think? That you realize how much of a fool you’ve made out of yourself so the only way out is for you to keep digging. I bet you’ve already seen the article by now and this is just your way of weaseling out of admitting you were wrong.
Flag all you want, deluding yourself about things seems to be your favorite MO!
No, it’s how educating yourself despite the other person works. I was right, you expect to be spoon fed knowledge like a school age child. You know they teach you how to research in grade school and it doesn’t involve begging for sources.
Insulting me won’t make your lies true. Sorry.
Being wilfully ignorant won’t make you any less stupid.
Is this the conversation thread you wish to continue with?
No, it’s how educating yourself despite the other person works. I was right, you expect to be spoon fed knowledge like a school age child. You know they teach you how to research in grade school and it doesn’t involve begging for sources.
I can’t agree with either of you. I need to go make a poopie now. Bye.