I’ve been using Linux Mint since forever. I’ve never felt a reason to change. But I’m interested in what persuaded others to move.

  • technologicalcaveman
    link
    fedilink
    411 months ago

    Debian, don’t like apt.
    Arch, breaks too much.
    NixOs, just don’t need the tools it provides.
    Any fork of a mainline distro because it’s never as good as the root.

    I used arch for a while, but got sick of running repairs every few weeks. I use Gentoo now, it’s stable and good. I have a fuck ton of ram and a good cpu, I also take advantage of binary packages from time to time. I don’t really need to install new things that much after having done the initial install.

      • technologicalcaveman
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        The arch breaks were always related to keys. I would run an update and there would always be an error related to the keys. Never had a breakage due to confs.

    • @steeznson
      link
      111 months ago

      I used to distro-hop until 2017 when I started using Gentoo as my main distro. I did not have the same experiences as you with Arch but I tended to avoid the AUR. Ultimately Gentoo has kept my attention by being more flexible rather than having negative experiences with Arch.

      I suppose I still distro-hop a little bit on an old laptop I’ve got but that one alternates between Debian and OpenBSD; also its primary use is a terminal for SSH’ing into my Gentoo desktop from the sofa.

      Probably the only distro I’ve had a truly bad experience with is Manjaro. The additional repo that it comes bundled with creates more problems than it solves. Also - although this never affected me personally - the story about developers asking their users to reset their system clocks to accept an expired PGP key is an absolute scandal.