• @Arthur_Leywin
    link
    31 year ago

    If the reason someone is attracted to a woman is because that woman looks like a child, then yes. If someone thinks the childlike woman is attractive for other qualities, then the woman is coincidentally childlike in that relationship. In the previous example, a relationship only occurs because she looks like a child. That is bad.

    There’s a subtle difference between starting a relationship because someone looks like a child and starting a relationship despite her looking like a child.

      • @Arthur_Leywin
        link
        31 year ago

        And you’re being disingenuous. If you google search “loli” it’s definitely not just someone with small tits.

          • @Arthur_Leywin
            link
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Ah so we’re going with the “there’s no clear definition” argument. I know you know what I mean because no one takes the time to say:

            “Nowadays people will call you a pedophile on extwitter for liking an image of a clothed Hatsune Miku.”

            You know what I’m talking about because no one would care if you said a character like Kiyomi Takada from Death Note was clothed or not. But you made it crystal clear that you meant clothed because there would be something very wrong otherwise. You can have the last word if you want man, all of you guys are just making excuses for yourselves.

    • @yamanii
      link
      -11 year ago

      There really isn’t, just reads like you are one of those that call preferences “fetish”, I’m allowed to not find skinny people attractive.

      • @Arthur_Leywin
        link
        21 year ago

        Google “loli” and tell me that’s something you’re okay with full-grown adults being attracted to and that it’s a “preference.”