Previous studies say patients of private-equity-owned health care entities pay higher costs, experience reduced staffing levels and have higher death rates in nursing homes.

Patients receiving care at hospitals owned by private-equity firms experience more bloodstream and surgical site infections and they fall more often, a new study by academics at Harvard University and the University of Chicago has found.

The research, published Tuesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association, comes after previous studies that have asserted patients of private-equity-owned health care entities pay higher costs, experience reduced staffing levels and, in the case of nursing homes, have higher death rates.

The new study is by Dr. Sneha Kannan and Dr. Zirui Song, both of Harvard, and Joseph Dov Bruch of the University of Chicago. It focused on patients’ health outcomes in private-equity-owned hospitals, an area, the academics said, where research has been scant. Private-equity firms have bought out more than 200 hospitals from non-private-equity owners, the study noted. In addition, as NBC News has previously reported, an estimated 40% of hospital emergency departments across the country are managed by private-equity-backed staffing companies.

  • OpenStars
    link
    fedilink
    9
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    First do no harm…

    Unless you can get moar profits that way, then do that instead.

    - shareholders, not even knowing or caring that the business is a hospital

    (I very much wish I could put a /s in this message, but sadly, I cannot, it seems)

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      311 months ago

      Doctors aren’t the ones making the decisions about staffing and care anymore when a private equity firm buys out a hospital.

      • Zorque
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Probably why they attributed their scenario to shareholders and not doctors.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Shareholders wouldn’t start with “First do no harm…”

          • Zorque
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Shareholders also wouldn’t say anything else in that statement. It’s made up for the internet to make a point.