Controversy has emerged in Poland after the salaries paid to key figures at state broadcaster TVP under the former Law and Justice (PiS) government, which left office earlier this month, were revealed by an MP from the new ruling coalition.

The revelations, including that two figures earned around 1.5 million zloty (€345,000) this year, have been condemned by the new administration, including Prime Minister Donald Tusk. They say that the pay was excessive and note that TVP was used by PiS as a propaganda mouthpiece.

But PiS has responded by pointing to what it says were similarly high earnings by TVP stars when Tusk was previously in power before 2015.

  • @Stamau123OP
    link
    English
    49 months ago

    It’s not important, but it shows PiS to be at best bad at managing, and at worst benefactors of graft, and trying to throw that back at the new government is silly

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I mean, if they decided to make some channels ad-free and increased subsidies that would be acceptable IMHO. Probably not what happened here, but it’s a model used for public broadcasters elsewhere (and ad-free channels are definitely a good thing).

    • Quokka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If it’s a public utility it should be run to benefit the public, not make a profit off of them.

      Anyone upset by that part is an idiot or a conservative, not that there’s a difference.

      • @Telodzrum
        link
        English
        69 months ago

        It also shouldn’t generate excessive waste in spending. It’s not a binary of profit vs. public good.

        • Quokka
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          You’re the first one here to mention excessive waste?

          That’s a seperate issue to turning a profit. There needs to be a cost/benefit analysis, but there never needs to be a profit driven motive.

          • @Telodzrum
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            It’s implicit in your comment above. Arguing otherwise is in bad faith.

            • Quokka
              link
              fedilink
              English
              49 months ago

              No, you’re very clearly introducing it into the discussion to try and deflect from criticism of profit seeking behaviour in public services.