Israel’s relentless bombardment of Gaza for nearly three months has destroyed 70 percent of the homes in the besieged Palestinian enclave, according to the Government Media Office.

No further details were provided but an earlier report said more than 200 heritage and archaeological sites were destroyed in the Israeli bombardment considered the most destructive in modern history.

About 300,000 out of 439,000 homes have been destroyed in Israeli attacks, a Wall Street Journal report said. Analysing satellite imagery, the report added that the 29,000 bombs dropped on the strip have targeted residential areas, Byzantine churches, hospitals and shopping malls and all civilian infrastructure has been damaged to an extent that they cannot be repaired.

“The word ‘Gaza’ is going to go down in history along with Dresden [Germany] and other famous cities that have been bombed,” Robert Pape, a political scientist at the University of Chicago who has written about the history of aerial bombing, told WSJ.

  • @nbafantest
    link
    English
    -201 year ago

    You’re seeing the way they can do it

    It’s clear that living next to Hamas is unacceptable to Israelis.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, so Israelis should relocate and dismantle the Israeli state. The comment you replied to meant the only way to remove Hamas is to end Israeli occupation of Palestine. Wouldn’t Israeli people be safer in say, Florida or anywhere else than where they are?

      • @nbafantest
        link
        English
        01 year ago

        Well thats just delusional

    • @SulaymanF
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      Living next to the ANC was unacceptable to South Africans too. Same with IRA next to British people. But a peace deal was made.

      • @nbafantest
        link
        English
        -4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What peace deal do you think Hamas would accept?

        • @SulaymanF
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Hamas has said since 2004 they are willing to accept a two state solution, and a long term peace, but not one where Israel continues to bomb them or try stealing more land. They’re hardliners but so is Likud.

            • @SulaymanF
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m very familiar with their positions despite the poorly-managed edit wars on Wikipedia. They are undoubtedly hardline but so is Likud. Hamas has been calling for a two state solution since 2004 (which they called “a divorce” from the Jews) and even updated their charter in 2017 to reflect that new reality. If all you know about them is Wikipedia then I’m sorry for you.