• @reversebananimals
    link
    English
    2011 months ago

    I would REALLY like to buy one of these. But I just can’t justify buying anything with a 60hz display in 2024.

      • @Land_Strider
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        If nothing else, UI flow feels a lot better. Difference, even in a smartphone while using menus or playing games, is significant. It can actually help reduce screen fatigue or dizziness a lot on games or videos with quick and drastic camera movements.

        However, in most cases, for a lot of people who were playing games even 10 years ago, it is a quality of life improvement akin to switching to a more comfortable chair, mouse or keyboard.

      • @TheGrandNagus
        link
        English
        411 months ago

        Once you get used to higher refresh rates, lower ones look stuttery.

        Sometimes when I go back to a lower refresh rate display, I even get some visual discomfort for a little while until I readjust.

        For me going to 90 or 120Hz is well worth the small hit to battery life.

      • @reversebananimals
        link
        English
        311 months ago

        It’s just an eye comfort thing. Higher refresh rate looks better, no matter what you’re doing.

        It’s not that I need it, it’s that if I’m dropping $500+ on a toy, how can it NOT have it when all my other devices do?

    • @atrielienz
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      I wouldn’t, and I did buy one. The display is fine for what amounts to a sub 12" tablet. The speaker should have been the same one on the Nest Hub max, and it should do in hub mode the same things the Nest Hub Max does. Also, multi user/account support shouldn’t be broken, and they shouldn’t have changed the home app on it to be like it is on phones.