What is it for?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    23
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the article they bring up many questionable aspects of this idea, which also seems to lack in scientific support.

    And so the bicameral mind remains a highly controversial idea

    • @adam_y
      link
      English
      131 year ago

      Absolutely. I’m no expert, and since there weren’t any studies performed on people from that era, I’d expect it to be taken as a theory rather than a fact.

        • @adam_y
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          Pedantry, not conversation.

          Still, you are correct.