MrSebSinM to Cyanide and [email protected] • 1 year ago3 January 2023sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1553arrow-down112
arrow-up1541arrow-down1image3 January 2023sh.itjust.worksMrSebSinM to Cyanide and [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square45fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink53•edit-21 year agoI mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to “It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.” The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
minus-squareVindictiveJudgelink19•1 year ago “It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.” Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year agoAnd some people can talk at length about an aspect of the franchise (?) that isn’t even a movie.
I mean, a lot of people spent a lot of time discussing the first one, it just boiled down to
“It’s sci-fi Dances With Wolves, and it made a load of money.”
The sequel is the same thing, but with whales and even more explicit environmentalism/anti-colonialism
All of the social criticism is correct, but, like, do something about it, billionaire filmmaker? The discussion time is over.
Sci-fi Pocahontas is more accurate, but yeah, there’s just not much to talk about beyond the effects.
I always heard it was fern gully remake.
And some people can talk at length about an aspect of the franchise (?) that isn’t even a movie.