• @_number8_
    link
    5410 months ago

    so i figure nothing earth shattering in here if we didn’t get 20 headlines about it?

    • peopleproblems
      link
      27
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      no. it’s either being written up carefully or suppressed. I’m at page 134, and oooo boy it’s juicy.

      edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

      edit 2: I’ll have to dig through later. a lot of pages are corrections to testimony. Notably though, is a few sections on Prince Andrew. He was clearly involved and at least present at the time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1410 months ago

        edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

        Probably implicates politicians and/or their owner donors. Can’t have the peasants know the atrocities of their lords.

      • @Linkerbaan
        link
        510 months ago

        What are the most interesting names on there? Feel free to just paste names in your comment so we can read along 1000 pages is a bit too much for me.

      • TwinTusks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        edit 326-343 are completely redacted.

        These might be the most interesting pages

    • @fleabomber
      link
      1010 months ago

      Apparently, the absence of something salacious is proof of something salacious.

    • @Twentytwodividedby7
      link
      610 months ago

      It’s a 900 page document, give it time. WSJ already released an article