• circuscritic
    link
    fedilink
    149
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    He killed the man who had molested him for years not as revenge, but because he HAD STARTED TO MOLEST HIS 6YR OLD NEPHEW.

    He should have NEVER gone to prison, much less be deported.

    • @Cosmonauticus
      link
      5
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean it’s a grey area. Giving them no jail time opens up a basket of approved vigilantism. On the other hand the system failed him already so why would he go back to them. This isn’t a cut and dry case

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        I thought we all needed guns for self defense? Or are we done pretending that’s a thing and are just admitting they’re only for killing minorities now?

        • @Zeon
          link
          -21 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Oh I didn’t know there were rules about how you could use a gun. I bet that will make all the parents of children murdered by guns at school feel better/s

            • @blazeknave
              link
              41 year ago

              And they’re saying it in defense of the pedophile rapist nonetheless

              • @Zeon
                link
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                deleted by creator

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        We have approved so much more vigilantism than this. Your house is your castle in so much of the US.

      • @Ultraviolet
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        A serial child rapist was actively molesting his 6 year old nephew. That’s defense of others, not vigilantism.