Dropping 2000lb bombs in refugee camps is not “precision bombs”

You mean like Israel bombing the designated safe area multiple times, or bombing civilian caravans, or bombing ambulances, or bombing hospitals, or killing hospital patients, or

Man, upwards of 90% of ALL munitions expended in Afghanistan by Coalition forces were guided ‘smart’ munitions. Afghanistan, as you may note, is not incredibly densely populated.

Israel has been using about 50% ‘dumb’ unguided munitions in Gaza, one of the most densely populated regions in the world.

Tales of exceptional precision in this campaign are propaganda bullshit.

Even if all the males 14+ are automatically considered combatants, the civilian death ratio would be 70% minimum (being women and children). That’s on top of Israel creating a famine, extreme water crisis, destroying the majority of medical infrastructure, and extremely limiting foreign aid (to a fraction of what was needed prior to Oct 7).

Sure, Isreal does technically have the capability to completely destroy Palestine in one quick operation, for instance, it could just use some of its almost certain to exist nuclear weapons on the relatively small area of Gaza. However, consider for a moment what the actual consequences of that or a similarly destructive action would be: Isreal may be powerful in its region, but it is not a global superpower after all. It receives considerable support from other countries, particularly the US and much of the EU, and losing that support, or even worse, managing to actually draw their anger, would put them in a dangerously vulnerable position with a fairly small population and land area and enemies on all sides. As it stands, their current actions have made supporting them somewhat divisive and politically charged in the west, but havent broadly lost them support, but doing something that blatantly indefensible might just be enough to do that. Further, the current Isreali government from my understanding doesnt have a perfect grip on popular support and power, and doing something that heinous might risk losing them domestic support as well.

Because they would be instantly villified and the world would need to react swiftly with shock and awe to overwhelm the military and remove the country’s leadership.

This way, the Zionists get to relish in hearing of daily murders, slowly and torturously eliminating a race of people they deem to be subhuman, for months and years to come with the implicit support of an uncaring world.

They don’t have the ordinance to do that, nor the means to fight a war on more than one front when the Arab world justifiably retaliates.

Are you trying to say the close to 30,000 people they have killed were intentional then? If they try not to kill anyone they didn’t mean to kill? Or am I misunderstanding you?