• @LufyCZ
    link
    2811 months ago

    It’s not, and I don’t even need to go look it up.

    Operating a subway is expensive. Maintenance, new lines, new trains, you name it, it costs shitloads

    • Aurelius
      link
      711 months ago

      It’s so expensive that the NYC subway used to be multiple private railroad companies but the business just wasn’t feasible (at a reasonable price) when the market had a downturn - which is why the city eventually took it over.

      This is why the track geographies are so odd in NYC

    • @dumpsterlid
      link
      English
      611 months ago

      Operating a subway is expensive only when you don’t compare it to operating a city on cars shrugs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yes exactly this. Car infrastructure is the most expensive transportation infrastructure per capita possible. It’s why the US spends tons of public money on transportation and has just crumbling highways to show for it.

        • @LufyCZ
          link
          211 months ago

          Might also be because of how massive the US is with relatively big distances between big cities

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            Most commutes are not between major cities, they are within metro regions, so the size of the US doesn’t explain the terrible infrastructure. Besides, for decades now, most of Europe has no political impediments to travel, same as the US. People can commute from Berlin to Madrid as if it were one country. Density matters, but not the size of the country.

            As for density, there are many US regions that are of similar density and distance apart as European cities, such as DC-NY-Boston, or Portland-Seattle-Vancouver, SF-LA, etc.