• @zazo
      link
      19 months ago

      The outrage is about an artist at WotC using an AI model trained on fully licensed images, so the plagiarism argument doesn’t hold any water in this case.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      That’s not what plagiarism means. At the very worst it could be a copyright violation, but they’re not really distributing someone else’s work without permission. Licensing issue? Possibly