I’m a software developer who fell in love with teaching. Unfortunately many companies providing an education in writing code are scams, and I’m sad to say I’m working for one right now. I’ve been playing with the idea of having free “learn to code” streams, to give people the education without ripping them off.

I also am interested in getting into music production ( I have a year of piano lessons under my belt! humble beginnings lol), and I have an eccentric art style if there is a desire for visuals that don’t feel derivative and samey like most modern art efforts. Attached is my most recent art piece.

I’m not just interested in teaching, really I want to just find other people who also enjoy creating and sharing information. I don’t care about being rich or going viral. I just want a social ecosystem where “Wouldn’t it be cool if…” is likely to be followed up by “Yeah, we should try it”, or “No I already attempted that, but here is what I learned.”

Anyways I’m here to help how I can!

  • ekisM
    link
    211 months ago

    I don’t know if we can go back to those places though, the internet has to be defined with the dimension of time and I don’t think it simply goes in reverse. Its not like technology has to “progress” either; these are concepts kinda taught to believe, and why most people assume evolution is towards something, at the very least they will say positive change; when all it implies is change. Change that does not significantly reduce the life expectancy and survival rates.

    Yeah I agree, because leftists can’t realy post opening on the public internet. Its a form of self-censorship, our records are definitely likely to be used against use; while right wing terrorists are often given funding.

    RIght now we need a solution that combines both being easy, secure, and ideally has the most of the data. And the security may enable you to have the last one; and if its presented in basically the same way could achieve the first.

    So because of the tools mostly being complete or much easier to work with since last time I looked, I’m going to put together a specialized DHT design I worked on to remove the need for seed nodes. Via-Psuedo Anonymous Trustlessness. For example if you opt for several trust strategies combined, you will end up with a better balance for practically every type of p2p protocol. Because of Bitcoin now no one knows what any of the defintions mean, what the components are, and just care about having unique tokens which is why recent “advancements” have been creation of tokens easily, essentially penny stocks; but even more unregulated. Cryptosecurities more than cryptocurrency; and I think assuming asymmetric encryption + p2p network leads to bad or currency; there is a lot being missed that we may need to start building.

    I have been working on p2p networks for a long time now, since basically BitTorrent made me obessed; and the truth is if you remove the “trustless” requirement out; so many things people think need to be in a p2p protocol, no longer need to be there making everything much simpler.

    I think mastodon or lemmy.ru is demonstrating a confederated design by using exact definitions, in away like a communalism bottom up approach. And I think there are obvious benefits to this model; I think its still inadequate because it doesn’t actually address the real problems. And I engineer to solve problems, so I like to be very conscious of the problems I’m trying to solve, otherwise how can I measure it to know if its working?

    • @thefloweracidicOP
      link
      110 months ago

      Very interesting, I know nothing about p2p networks but from what I can infer your idea sounds very interesting and is a large departure from the “It “works” ship it now” model currently plaguing the tech sphere. I find intentional and carefully thought out designs often solve many of the bugs and oversight you run into in applications, and often result in something much more simple.