A defendant who was captured in courtroom video leaping over a judge’s bench and attacking her, touching off a bloody brawl, is scheduled to appear before her again Monday morning.

In his Jan. 3 appearance before Clark County District Court Judge Mary Kay Holthus, Deobra Redden, who was facing prison time for a felony battery charge stemming from a baseball bat attack last year, tried to convince the judge that he was turning around his violent past.

Redden asked for leniency while describing himself as “a person who never stops trying to do the right thing no matter how hard it is.”

But when it became clear Holthus was going to sentence him to prison time, and as the court marshal moved to handcuff and take him into custody, Redden yelled expletives and charged forward. People in the courtroom audience, including his foster mother, began to scream.

  • @slowwooderrunsdeep
    link
    1911 months ago

    From the article:

    Redden’s criminal record is marked by mostly violent offenses and includes prior convictions for three felonies and nine misdemeanors, District Attorney Steve Wolfson said. “He’s been violent his entire adult life,” Wolfson said. Redden, 30, had tried to convince the judge otherwise Wednesday.

    I’m not saying he can’t turn his life around, but I’d venture to say he hasn’t been reformed yet. Most functional citizens know by 30 that you can’t assault a judge.

    • @Earthwormjim91
      link
      111 months ago

      I mean I’ll say he can’t turn his life around. Multiple violent offenses is the entire point of jail. People like that should be permanently removed from society.

        • @Earthwormjim91
          link
          -4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          No, not everyone can. Some people are irredeemable, and some crimes are unforgivable and should result in permanent removal from society regardless of reformation.

          This is a dude that has multiple convictions for increasingly escalating violent assaults. This most recent one was for beating someone nearly to death with a baseball bat.

          How many chances should he get to kill someone?

          Fucking idiots will bend over backwards to defend violent scumbags before defending the innocent people these fucks prey on.

            • @Earthwormjim91
              link
              -311 months ago

              You didn’t say change. You said turn their life around. Don’t change your words now, bud. To which I said, no not everyone can turn their life around. Some people are only capable of getting worse.

              And sure that’s the point of the criminal justice system, ideally.

              The point of jail/prison itself is to keep offenders segregated from society while that happens, with security levels matching the severity and risk of the offender. For those that cannot be reformed or have committed unforgivable crimes, the point is to permanently segregate them from society to prevent them from further harming it.

                • @Earthwormjim91
                  link
                  -211 months ago

                  My god you really have no reading comprehension do you? Or you just don’t know how to have a good faith conversation.

                  YOU started with the colloquialism. That was entirely you. I never used it other than responding to YOUR use of it.

                  I know what it means, and I am arguing that SOME people are NOT capable of changing for the better. SOME people only change for the worst.

                  Violent crimes are also not “making a mistake”, ffs. They are a conscious act to decide to severely harm another person. In this dudes case he consciously made the decision to try to end another person’s life by violently beating them with a baseball bat. After having repeated other offenses of violently attacking others and being given chances to reform.

                  And even then he was given incredible leniency by having the charge dropped from assault with a deadly weapon to attempted assault causing substantial bodily harm.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      the only part i disagree with is “entire adult life”

      at 30 dude hasn’t had an entire adult life yet so that seems prejudicial