@TheJims to politics • 1 year agoExperts: Jack Smith’s “dramatic new proof” so “overwhelming” reluctant witnesses may decide to flipwww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square55arrow-up1413arrow-down117 cross-posted to: news
arrow-up1396arrow-down1external-linkExperts: Jack Smith’s “dramatic new proof” so “overwhelming” reluctant witnesses may decide to flipwww.salon.com@TheJims to politics • 1 year agomessage-square55 cross-posted to: news
minus-square@zoostationlink32•1 year agoIt was profitable, 34 people and 3 companies were indicted, and it substantiated election interference.
It was profitable, 34 people and 3 companies were indicted, and it substantiated election interference.