The New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times’s coverage of Israel’s war on Gaza showed a consistent bias against Palestinians, according to an Intercept analysis of major media coverage.

The print media outlets, which play an influential role in shaping U.S. views of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, paid little attention to the unprecedented impact of Israel’s siege and bombing campaign on both children and journalists in the Gaza Strip.

Major U.S. newspapers disproportionately emphasized Israeli deaths in the conflict; used emotive language to describe the killings of Israelis, but not Palestinians; and offered lopsided coverage of antisemitic acts in the U.S., while largely ignoring anti-Muslim racism in the wake of October 7. Pro-Palestinian activists have accused major publications of pro-Israel bias, with the New York Times seeing protests Opens in a new tabat its headquarters in Manhattan for its coverage of Gaza –– an accusation supported by our analysis.

  • @LinkerbaanOP
    link
    English
    -11 year ago

    I’m sorry they’re not making up rape fictions about Hamas. You’re going to have to do with an article that actually has verifiable sources and evidence inside of it.

    • @Flyswat
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      I salute your patience.

      • @LinkerbaanOP
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Thanks. It’s the least we can do. Palestinians are being Genocided while our “reputable media” manufactures consent with articles like this

    • @Arete
      link
      English
      01 year ago

      Well shit this article says some of the freedom fighters were actually raped by the festival goers, so I take that back.