@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agopoor Deanlemmy.mlimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up11.2Karrow-down111cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1imagepoor Deanlemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square84fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@nomouslink11•1 year agoIt could be, all his stuff is extremely similar. He reuses character archetypes and narrative shifts throughout most of his stories. Early on in his career it wasn’t as bad but he’s been churning them out for awhile.
minus-square@Sanity_in_Moderationlink2•edit-21 year agoI’ve never read any of his books. Top 3? Just the titles. I’ll go in blind.
minus-square@TheRedSpadelink1•edit-21 year agoI’ve only read two of his series but enjoyed both a good deal. Odd Thomas (first book shares title with the series) Frankenstein (first book is Prodigal Son)
It could be, all his stuff is extremely similar. He reuses character archetypes and narrative shifts throughout most of his stories.
Early on in his career it wasn’t as bad but he’s been churning them out for awhile.
I’ve never read any of his books. Top 3? Just the titles. I’ll go in blind.
I’ve only read two of his series but enjoyed both a good deal.
Odd Thomas (first book shares title with the series)
Frankenstein (first book is Prodigal Son)