I did some research and couldn’t discern if the author was a classical economist, or a proponent of Keynesian or neo-Keynesian economics. Regardless, until the “invisible hand” remedies poverty from wealth inequality and homelessness nonexistent; I’ll stick with Marxism.
Homelessness can be fixed with government spending and capitalist countries has largely fixed homelessness. There always going to be some people that don’t want a home forwhatever reason so never going to be 0 unless you lock certain people in their homes.
Well yea we will all have equal weather when we have nothing under Marxism. Not sure that’s ideal though.
I did some research and couldn’t discern if the author was a classical economist, or a proponent of Keynesian or neo-Keynesian economics. Regardless, until the “invisible hand” remedies poverty from wealth inequality and homelessness nonexistent; I’ll stick with Marxism.
Homelessness can be fixed with government spending and capitalist countries has largely fixed homelessness. There always going to be some people that don’t want a home forwhatever reason so never going to be 0 unless you lock certain people in their homes.
Well yea we will all have equal weather when we have nothing under Marxism. Not sure that’s ideal though.
It is ideal to me. Overconsumption and Climate Change. Something’s going to give. And Mother Nature doesn’t bank at Wells Fargo.
Communism is inefficient though it leads to more waste. And not to mention most of the biggest ecological disasters have happened under communism.
Good luck short-selling during the water wars.