• @postmateDumbass
    link
    -11 year ago

    USA killed plenty civilianscin Iraq and Afghanistan.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      31 year ago

      Oh look a whataboutism in the wild. Maybe this definition will help you.

      • @postmateDumbass
        link
        -3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Lol what a pathetic taunt.

        Edit for the ultra daft downvote crew: the fact the US killed civilians is directly relevant to the blub i responded to, the one claiming the US was bettter than Israel because it did not kill civilians.

        For the extra determined ignoramouses ive provided this as an example :

        • @Maggoty
          link
          111 months ago

          Mhhhmm. Didn’t read the definition I see.

          • @postmateDumbass
            link
            011 months ago

            Your link to the definition of ‘avoid’?

            I avoided nothing. I addressed the issue directly.

            The USA kills civilians.

            Israel does at a much faster rate. A genocidal one in fact.

            But that does not give any creedence to the notion the USA is innocent.

            QED JFC

            • @Maggoty
              link
              111 months ago

              Now you’re moving the goalpost. Dude, just admit your wrong. The US goes to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties.

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  211 months ago

                  I have actually. I also saw the unedited version WikiLeaks was really hoping nobody would see.

              • @postmateDumbass
                link
                011 months ago

                Nevwr moved the goal posts. You just need a bit more reading comprehension.

                And no, civilian damage and deaths will not prevent the USA from striking targets.

                Look up Obama’s record of drone striking weddings.

                It is why i left the industry.

                Ive been inside DARPA and the Pentagon discussong collateral damage.

                Avoiding it is not a priority.

                Why?

                1. to be feared by tge enemy

                2. so the enemy cannot use human shields

                But directly targeting non combatants and hiding behind ‘faulty intelligence’ has been a common occurance.

                Remember the car full of water and children the US blew up as they left Afghanistan?

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  111 months ago

                  You should really read that definition of avoid. Because you keep using it as an absolute term when it very much is not.

                  And I don’t care if you were some white coat back in the States. I was on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan. If we weren’t worried about avoiding civilian casualties we wouldn’t have gotten out with so few.

                  • Sybil
                    link
                    011 months ago

                    could have avoided all of them. literally every single one.