In an interview with the Guardian from his home base in Burlington, Vermont, Sanders urged the Democratic president to inject more urgency into his bid for re-election. He said that unless the president was more direct in recognising the many crises faced by working-class families his Republican rival would win.

“We’ve got to see the White House move more aggressively on healthcare, on housing, on tax reform, on the high cost of prescription drugs,” Sanders said. “If we can get the president to move in that direction, he will win; if not, he’s going to lose.”

The US senator from Vermont added that he was in contact with the White House pressing that point. “We hope to make clear to the president and his team that they are not going to win this election unless they come up with a progressive agenda that speaks to the needs of the working class of this country.”

Sanders’ warning comes at a critical time in American politics. On Monday, Republicans in Iowa will gather for caucuses that mark the official start of the 2024 presidential election.

Biden faces no serious challenger in the Democratic primaries. But concern is mounting over how he would fare against Trump given a likely rematch between them in November.

  • oce 🐆
    link
    fedilink
    -811 months ago

    Maybe he would have lost his aura because he wouldn’t have had the means to do what he says should be done.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Maybe he would have lost his aura

      At this point Bernie’s lost at least some of it; I can’t disagree with those who’ve accused him of sheepdogging, although I think he was trying to do the best he could with what he had.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        Sanders not burning his own party cost him much of his clout. Frankly they deserved it for what they did to him and his show of weakness backing the warhawk Clinton was awful to see from someone who usually has so much fire.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          Bernie’s moral code includes supporting his party’s “democratic” ways, as anything else would be a coup in its own right.

          Even if I believe he’s off the mark in doing that, I admire him for it. It’s rare to see these days.

          • @Linkerbaan
            link
            -1011 months ago

            Admirable? Blind slavery to a corrupt system? I fail to see what is admirable about not trying to fix a country but instead keeping corruption alive.

            • Xhieron
              link
              English
              611 months ago

              What alternative would you propose? Say what you will about Sanders, but he actually wants the Republic to last, imperfect though it may be. Apparently many of his critics prefer a politician who will throw a tantrum if things don’t go his way and then try to bring down the whole nation. That reminds me of someone else.

              • @Linkerbaan
                link
                -611 months ago

                What a brave man supporting genocide and imperialism. The empire must last a 1000 years and nobody should ever try to change it.

                • Xhieron
                  link
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Your change involves kids in cages, dead immigrants in rivers, American military deployment in American cities, assassinated political opponents, and dead women in American hospitals. I think I prefer Joe Biden.

                  Just to be clear–I’m not a fan of the ongoing Palestinian genocide. It’s reprehensible. But Biden didn’t cause that. The US supports the state of Israel for complex geopolitical reasons that aren’t that different from why it also supports other regimes that lack stirling human rights records, and those reasons date back nearly a hundred years. That’s realpolitik, and you might not like how the diplomatic sausage is made. It’s not pretty for the US, and I hate to be the one to break it to you, but it’s not pretty for other nations either. But guess what? If Bernie Sanders were president, or if Donald Trump were president, you know what would be different about America’s foreign policy position re Israel? Not a goddamned thing. Because this is as good as it gets. It’s a calculated diplomatic position. Not pretty, and not fun politically, but every alternative is as morally black or worse, and absolutely worse for US interests.

                  The US is an empire. It does empire things. Sometimes I don’t like those things. But I live here. So yeah, 1000 years sounds nice. Certainly beats trying to kill the whole experiment in less than four. That’s what the other guy wants. Personally, I’d rather keep it around to try to do some fixing.

                  But keep it coming with the hyperbole if it makes you feel righteous.

                  • @Linkerbaan
                    link
                    0
                    edit-2
                    11 months ago

                    israel does everything you claim but worse.

                    Kids in cages? How about malnourished kids in cages but they’re actively beaten up and tear gassed by the IDF.

                    Assasinating political opponents? How about blowing up their entire neighborhood.

                    Dead women in hospitals? How about blowing up the entire hospital. How about having kids getting their legs sawn off without anesthetics because they need to get them amputated from being bombed.

                    If you have to choose between Hitler and Stalin, maybe wake up to reality and stop abiding this insanity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Sanders not burning his own party cost him much of his clout.

          Technically it’s not his own party since he’s an independent who caucuses with the Democrats, but otherwise I know exactly what you mean.